.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

I Shaved My Head When Robert Stanfield Died

"...because Canadian politics is a baffling mystery that, when explained, still doesn't make sense, and has no bearing on anything." -Commenter on a Diefenbaker YTMND I made

Thursday, March 09, 2006

Were the wheels ever on?

So let me get this straight:

1. Emmerson re-elected. "Proud to be a Liberal"

2. Two weeks later Emerson joins Conservative cabinet, saying that he wanted to continue to serve as cabinet minister.

3. Conservatives, namely Peter MacKay, deflect by saying that this is diffferent than the Stronach defection. He's right Blindy had a pretext for why she fell out with her party. For Alan Park's take go here and watch "Emerson in the Dumps"

4. New Democrat from Burnaby-Sourgrapes or somewhere calls up the ethics commissioner, charging that cabinet positions are, in effect, bribes, and thus Harper, who was courting Emerson during the election was somehow bribing him.

5. Ethics comissioner decides that this case is unique ans based on complaint from lone New Democrat launches an investigation.

6. Ralph Goodale kicks back in an easy chair with a big scotch and soda.

7. PMO claims that Shapiro is a Liberal hack and tried to have him removed the moment he took power, making the ethics comissioner not so much responsible to parliament as to the PMO

8. Conservative sound-biters claim that then Mr. Harper will be able to deliver an ethics comissioner who is truly accountable.

So... If we take everyone at their words:

The Liberal Party wins one, they lose one, and they can balm their wounds with the fact that it makes Harper look like a hypocrite beccause he ruled out this sort of behavior.

The Conservative Party is making a mockery of logic and they are trying to exploit residual anger over the previous conduct of the Liberal party to give them the political capital to ride this out.

The NDP is continuing in their fine role of having every person who is clearly innocent investigated by making a complaint in the grave tone that only years of incestuous policy meetings and groupthink can breed.

And people wonder why I'm a PC.

2 Comments:

At 13 March, 2006, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Joe Harper.

Lots of comparisons between Joe Clark and Stephen Harper:

• both won narrow minority governments.
• both faced a former governing party in a temporary state of transition.
• both thought they were the first of a long-term wave of Conservatism to sweep over Canada and become the "natural governing party".
• both underestimated the real support for their party.
• both came into power due to voters wishing to spank the governing party and send them to the penalty box for a while.
• both acted as if they had a majority government.

But there are two major differences between Joe Clerk and Stephen Harper:

1. Joe Clark did not behave in ethically questionable ways from the get go.
2. Joe's arrogance was political, not personal.

Of course, what happened to Joe will now happen to Stephen: a footnote in Canada's decorous but tempestuous political history.

 
At 13 March, 2006, Blogger Sean Tisdall said...

Perhaps, but Stephen will not retain the political capital that Joe did after losing.

Can you imagine Stephen dutifully serving another PM and making his mark in that fashion?

 

Post a Comment

<< Home